» Último acesso em: esse e seu primeiro acesso ao painel de controle!
Olá,
Perfil
Usuários
Seções
Sair
Início
Ao vivo
Multimídia
Galeria de Imagens
Vídeos
TV do Zaca
Podcast
Áudios
Config Bronca
Banners
Banner Diversos
Mini Banner
Banner Rodapé
Square Banner
Banner PopUp
Full Banner
Notícias
Categoria
Notícias
Comentários em Avaliação
Comentários Publicados
Outras Notícias
Colunas
Correio do Zaca
Páginas Internas
Colunista
Colunista
Colunas
Comentários em Avaliação
Comentários Publicados
Blogs
Classificados
Categoria
Classificados
Currículos
Categoria
Currículos
Charge
Notícias ↪ Comentários em Avaliação
Nome:
Email:
Comentário:
Our digital literacy workshop will discuss how websites classify face outlines. The exercise should teach people to question a label rather than compete for a particular result. For the reading list, I am considering a page associated with the phrase what is my face shape because the wording makes the classification question explicit. I have not evaluated its output. Before looking at a label, learners could list the proportions they think a method uses. We could then identify what the photograph does not show clearly enough to judge. No participant would need to upload a personal image; a discussion of example descriptions would be sufficient. Each group could explain which evidence would change its initial interpretation. We could also compare two written descriptions of the same outline and ask whether their labels mean the same thing. This would make the assumptions available for discussion without requiring a supposedly correct personal result. How would you keep the conversation focused on evidence and uncertainty throughout the session?